Colon and rectal cancer risk after bariatric surgery in a multicountry Nordic cohort study

Obesity is a risk factor for colorectal cancer. Yet, some research indicates that weight-reducing bariatric surgery also increases colorectal cancer risk. Our study was undertaken because current evidence examining bariatric surgery and risk of colorectal cancer is limited and inconsistent. This population-based cohort study included adults with a documented obesity diagnosis in Denmark, Finland, Iceland, Norway or Sweden in 1980–2015. The incidence of colorectal cancer in participants with obesity who had and had not undergone bariatric surgery was compared to the incidence in the corresponding background population by calculating standardized incidence ratios (SIR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Additionally, operated and nonoperated participants with obesity were compared using multivariable Cox regression, providing hazard ratios (HR) with 95% CIs adjusted for confounders. Among 502,772 cohort participants with an obesity diagnosis, 49,931(9.9%) underwent bariatric surgery. The overall SIR of colon cancer was increased after bariatric surgery (SIR 1.56; 95% CI 1.28–1.88), with higher SIRs ≥10 years postsurgery. The overall HR of colon cancer in operated compared to nonoperated participants was 1.13 (95% CI 0.92–1.39) and 1.55 (95% CI 1.04–2.31) 10–14 years after bariatric surgery. Bariatric surgery did not significantly increase the risk of rectal cancer (SIR 1.14, 95% CI 0.83–1.52; HR 1.08, 95% CI 0.79–1.49), but the risk estimates increased with longer follow-up periods. Our study suggests that bariatric surgery is associated with an increased risk of colon cancer, while the support for an increased risk of rectal cancer was weaker.     

子宫肌瘤微创手术中右美托咪定给药方式对比

目的探究右美托咪定不同给药方式在子宫肌瘤微创手术患者中的应用效果对比。方法选取于本院诊治的子宫肌瘤并进行微创手术的患者,分为两组,每组30例。第一组,单次注射组(SI组);第二组,持续注射组(CI组)。SI组和CI组患者在一般资料上差异无统计学意义。通过分析SI组和CI组患者心率、平均动脉压、应激反应相关指标、继发效应的差异性来探究右美托咪定不同给药方式在子宫肌瘤微创手术患者中的应用效果对比。结果在T0时间点,SI组和CI组患者心率、平均动脉压指标数据相近(P>0.05),在T1、T2时间点,SI组患者平均动脉压、心率等指标比CI组优良(P<0.05)。麻醉前,SI组和CI组患者应激反应相关指标数值相差较小(P>0.05),术后,SI组患者应激反应相关指标比CI组优良(P<0.05)。两组患者继发效应发生情况差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论右美托咪定在手术过程中麻醉效果显著,但单次注射的方法对患者的麻醉效果更佳,继发效应更少。     

全麻复合硬膜外麻醉对肺癌根治术患者外周血T细胞亚群及NK细胞活性的影响

目的探讨全麻复合硬膜外麻醉对肺癌根治术患者外周血T细胞亚群及NK细胞活性的影响。方法收集接受肺癌根治术的84例患者的病历资料,按照患者所行麻醉方式的不同对其进行分组,单纯行全麻者42例归为对照组,行全麻复合硬膜外麻醉者42例纳入观察组,分析不同麻醉方式对患者外周血T细胞亚群及NK细胞活性影响的差异性。结果术后24 h观察组与对照组患者的CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+、CD4^+/CD8^+、NK细胞水平均较术前明显降低,且术后24 h相比对照组患者的CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+、CD4^+/CD8^+、NK细胞水平,观察组患者以上指标水平明显更高(P<0.05)。术后1周2组患者的CD3^+、CD4^+、CD8^+、CD4^+/CD8^+水平与术前相比并无明显差异(P>0.05),但NK细胞水平较术前明显降低(P<0.05),且术后1周相比对照组患者,观察组患者的NK细胞水平更高(P<0.05)。观察组患者的术后苏醒时间、术后拔管时间、自主呼吸恢复时间均明显短于对照组患者,2组差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论相比单纯全麻,全麻复合硬膜外麻醉对肺癌根治术患者外周血T细胞亚群及NK细胞活性的影响更小,有助于患者术后的恢复。     

心脏外科专业型硕士研究生培养模式思考

在我国临床医学专业学位硕士研究生同住院医师规范化培训并轨政策全面落实的背景下,心脏外科专业型硕士研究生从招生到培养过程中呈现出一些问题,通过从规范化培训计划的制定、人文素养和科研素养培育3个方面,结合教学体会提出了当前培养模式下对心脏外科专业型硕士研究生综合培养的思考。     

局部复发鼻咽癌的外科挽救治疗CSCD

鼻咽癌放疗后约10%~36%的患者复发。复发病灶通常对放疗不敏感,再程放疗疗效不佳,且会导致严重并发症,而外科治疗可以根治性切除癌灶并避免二次照射,成为复发鼻咽癌理想的挽救治疗方法。鼻外入路挽救手术创伤较大,且均存在不同程度的手术并发症。经鼻内镜鼻咽切除术因微创、切除范围不亚于鼻外入路,逐步成为rT1~2及部分rT3期患者的首选方案,相应的外科分期为复发鼻咽癌的分层治疗提供了科学依据。颈内动脉栓塞术、颅内外血管搭桥术等新技术的运用正在扩大挽救手术适应证,但广泛的外科切除是否优于二程放疗仍需更多实践验证。     

彩色多普勒超声引导下亚甲蓝边界定位法在乳腺癌保乳手术中的应用价值

目的探讨术前彩色多普勒超声引导下应用亚甲蓝定位肿瘤边界在乳腺癌保乳手术中的效果。方法收集2015年5月至2017年12月拟行保乳手术的乳腺癌患者120例,随机分为观察组和对照组各60例。观察组术前在彩色多普勒超声引导下行亚甲蓝定位,对照组采用传统手术方法。所有标本切除后进行病理检查,统计两组切缘情况。从精准性及微创性两方面比较两种方法的手术效果。结果观察组中,3例(5.0%)最大切缘>2 cm,57例(95.0%)最大切缘≤2 cm;对照组中,31例(51.7%)最大切缘>2 cm,29例(48.3%)最大切缘≤2 cm。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.000)。观察组6例(10.0%)患者的手术标本镜下切缘阳性,54例(90.0%)切缘阴性;对照组15例(25.0%)镜下切缘阳性,45例(75.0%)切缘阴性。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P=0.031)。观察组和对照组分别有2例和3例在行二次扩切后切缘仍为阳性,改行乳腺全切手术。结论采用术前彩色多普勒超声引导下亚甲蓝定位肿瘤边界指导乳腺癌保乳手术的方法较常规方法在手术精准性及微创性两方面均有优势。     

胃癌微创外科临床研究进展及展望（2000-2020）

目前临床研究已证实腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗早期胃癌的安全性、可行性和有效性。基于此，第4版日本《胃癌治疗指南》推荐腹腔镜手术治疗临床Ⅰ期远端胃癌。然而，腹腔镜胃癌手术治疗进展期胃癌的有效性和安全性仍存争议。中国腹腔镜胃肠外科研究组（CLASS研究组）发起的CLASS-01研究顺利完成，提供了全球首个局部进展期胃癌腹腔镜手术安全性和疗效的前瞻性多中心证据。胃癌外科的主流方向在从“大切口和扩大化手术切除”逐渐向“微创、精准化手术”转变，以使手术安全性和病人术后生活质量最优化。     

Pulmonary Carcinosarcoma: A Surveillance,Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) Analysis

IntroductionPulmonary carcinosarcoma (PC) is a rare malignant neoplasm composed of epithelial and mesenchymal components. It accounts for < 1% of thoracic cancers and is not fully understood. This study examined Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) data to describe demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with PC and assessed survival outcomes by treatment modality and stage.Patients and MethodsSEER data were reviewed to identify patients diagnosed with primary PC (1973-2012). Overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) were analyzed by univariate/multivariable Cox proportional hazards models and Kaplan-Meier methods.ResultsA total of 411 patients were included. Median age was 67 (range, 24-96) years. Disease stage at the time of initial diagnosis was known for 74.7% of the identified patients (307/411). Of these patients, 23.1% had localized disease. Survival was significantly better for patients with localized disease (OS: 31 vs. 6 months, P < .001; DSS: 54 vs. 8 months, P < .001). Additionally, patients who received surgery alone had significantly improved OS (20 months; P < .001) and DSS (32 months; P < .001) compared to patients who received combined surgery and radiotherapy (OS: 7 months; DSS: 8 months) or radiotherapy alone (OS: 4 months; DSS: 4 months).ConclusionTreatment with surgery alone resulted in superior survival outcomes compared to other treatment modality combinations, regardless of patient age and disease stage. Within the limitations of this study, providers may wish to consider these findings when devising patient treatment plans.